DG Creatività Contemporanea - MiC
Search
.

Bibliography

Our book

Cover by 2% / 717 / 1949. The 2% law and art in public spaces - Rome, Cura.Books, 2017

DGCC (ed.), 2 % / 717 / 1949. The 2% law and art in public spaces, Rome, Cura.Books, 2017.

Monographs and catalogues

Essays and contributions

  • Andrea Emiliani, “A reform of Law 717 or 2% cannot be postponed”, in Report of the Superintendency of the Galleries of Bologna 1970, Bologna, Alfa, 1971, pp. 55-67.
  • Elisabetta Cristallini, “The law of 2 percent”, in Simonetta Lux and Ester Coen (eds.), 1935. Artists in the university and the question of mural painting, Rome, Multigrafica, 1985
  • Elisabetta Cristallini, “The 2% law and the mosaic competition”, in Maurizio Calvesi, Enrico Guidoni and Simonetta Lux (eds.), E42. Utopia and scenario of the regime, Venice, Marsilio, 1987
  • Carlo Fabrizio Carli, “The Volta Conference of 1936”, in Vittorio Fagone, Giovanna Ginex and Tulliola Sparagni (eds.), Muri ai pittori. Mural painting and decoration in Italy 1930-1950, exhibition catalog (Milan, Museo della Permanente, 16 October 1999-3 January 2000), Milan, Mazzotta, 1999, pp. 97-103
  • Tulliola Sparagni, “Artfor a new city”, in Vittorio Fagone, Giovanna Ginex and Tulliola Sparagni (eds.), Muri ai pittori. Mural painting and decoration in Italy 1930-1950, exhibition catalog (Milan, Museo della Permanente, 16 October 1999-3 January 2000), Milan, Mazzotta, 1999, pp. 120-121
  • “Art in public buildings and the 2% law” (introduction by Maria Stella Margozzi), in Vincenzo Cazzato (ed.), Cultural institutions and policies in Italy in the 1930s, Rome, Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca of the State, 2001, pp. 123-214.
  • Martina De Luca, “From the monument to the space of relationships”, in Ead. (ed.), Contemporary creation. Art, society and territory between public and private, Rome, Luca Sossella, 2004, pp. 89-103.
  • Eva Di Stefano, “Art and public spaces”, in The new Palace of Justice of Palermo, Palermo, Sellerio, 2004, pp. 128-135.
  • Claudia Collina, “Law 717 of 1949. The 2% in Emilia-Romagna: first evaluations”, in Maristella Casciato and Piero Orlandi (eds.), Which and how much architecture. Architecture in Emilia-Romagna in the second half of the twentieth century, Bologna, CLEUB, 2005, pp. 149-155.
  • Lorenza Perelli, “Percent for art” / “The 2% law for public art projects in Venice”, in Ead., Public Art. Art, interaction and urban project, Milan, Franco Angeli, 2006, pp. 24-28.
  • Carlo Pozzi, “The project of works of art”, in The Palace of Justice of Pescara. Pescara Courts of Justice. A PROGER Total Engineering and Management Experience, Pescara, Carsa Edizioni, 2006, pp. 80-89.
  • “Public art between incisiveness and uselessness. The role of public bodies in defining urban space. Conversation between Andrea Lissoni and Stefano Boeri”, in Carlo Birrozzi and Marina Pugliese (eds.), Public art in urban space. Clients, artists and users, Milan, Bruno Mondadori, 2007, pp. 62-66.
  • Vito Zagarrio, “The law of 2% or contemporary art” in Id., Primato. Art, culture, cinema of fascism through an exemplary magazine, Rome, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2008, pp. 133-138.
  • Claudia Collina, “Percentage for art in public buildings in Emilia Romagna: from the census to preventive conservation”, in Giovanna Cassese (ed.), The conservation of public art in Italy. The case of the art metro in Naples, proceedings of the study day (Naples, Academy of Fine Arts, 19 March 2009), Naples, arte’m, 2009, pp. 99-105.
  • Achille Bonito Oliva, “The Naples Metro: the obligatory museum”, in Giovanna Cassese (ed.), The conservation of public art in Italy. The case of the art metro in Naples, proceedings of the study day (Naples, Academy of Fine Arts, 19 March 2009), Naples, arte’m, 2009, pp. 27-28.
  • “MAXXI 2 per 100”, in Mario Avagnina, Margherita Guccione and Silvia La Pergola (eds.), MAXXI Gray Matter. The story of construction, Milan, Electa, 2010, pp. 212-215.
  • Alessandra Donati, “Legal measures for art in public buildings”, in Agata C. Amato Mangiameli, Carla Faralli and Maria Paolo Mittica (eds.), Art and limit. The measure of law, Ariccia, Aracne, 2012, pp. 325-340.

Articles and reviews

  • Giuseppe Bottai, “Sociality of art”, Primato, n. 8, 15 April 1942, pp. 151-152.
  • Virgilio Guzzi, “The law for artists”, Primato, n. 8, 15 April 1942, pp. 153-154.
  • “The law for artists” (interventions by Marcello Piacentini, Ferruccio Ferrazzi, Ottone Rosai, Massimo Campigli, Melchiorre Bega), Primato, n. 11, 1 June 1942, pp. 209-211.
  • “The law for artists” (interventions by Giuseppe Pagano, Pietro Maria Bardi, Gianni Vagnetti, Felice Casorati, Arnaldo Foschini, Michele Guerrisi, Carlo Carrà), Il Primato, n. 12, 15 June 1942, pp. 234-236.
  • “The law for artists” (interventions by Nino Bertocchi, Renato Birolli, Quinto Martini, Filippo De Pisis, Mario Labò), Primato, n. 13, 1 July 1942, pp. 234-236.
  • “The law for artists” (interventions by Gio Ponti, Alberto Salietti, Enrico Paulucci), Primato, n. 14, 15 July 1942, pp. 270-271.
  • Virgilio Guzzi, “Architecture and figurative arts”, Primato, n. 15, 1 August 1942, pp. 279-280.
  • “The law for artists” (interventions by Gino Severini and Giovanni Michelucci), Primato, n. 15, 1 August 1942, pp. 290-291.
  • “Relationships between architecture and figurative arts” (interventions by Marcello Piacentini and Virgilio Guzzi), Primato, n. 17, 1 September 1942, pp. 317-318.
  • Vito Apuleius, “The pious paraphrases”, NAC, n. 10, October 1971, p. 11.
  • Giacomo Baragli, “The solution is politics”, NAC, n. 11, November 1971, pp. 9-10.
  • Ugo Ugo, “I feet on the ground”, NAC, n. 2, February 1972, p. 8.
  • Francesco Vincitorio, “The problem of the union”, NAC, n. 3rd March1972, pp. 7-8.
  • Francesco Vincitorio, “If Sparta cries…”, NAC, n. 4, April 1972, p. 13.
  • Enzo Brunori, “Necessary stages”, NAC, n. 5, May 1972, pp. 8-9.
  • Editorial, “Yes and no”, NAC, n. 6-7, May-June 1972, p. 11.
  • Rolando Monti, “Four proposals”, NAC, n. 6-7, May-June 1972, p. 11.
  • Marina Le Noci and Daniele Riva, “Fascist law”, NAC, n. 6-7, May-June 1972, p. 12.
  • Giorgio Seveso, “A different use”, NAC, n. 10, October 1972, pp. 14-15.
  • Ernesto Treccani, “A letter”, NAC, n. 11, November 1972, p. 9.
  • Francesco Vincitorio, “The substance of the problem”, NAC, n. 12, December 1972, p. 7.
  • Mario Grilli, “Cutting at the root”, NAC, n. 2, February 1973, p. 5.
  • Tullio Vietri, “Implementation of the corporate law for art in public buildings or total implementation and defense of the Constitution of the Democratic Republic at least starting from the discussion on the necessary repeal of this law?”, Radical Criticism, n. 2, July-December 1991, pp. 10-20.
  • “The 2% is recalculated in Turin”, Il Giornale dell’Arte, n. 152, February 1997, p. 3.
  • “2%: tenfold is not enough”, Il Giornale dell’Arte, n. 154, April 1997, p. 10.
  • “2%: less ‘beautiful’, more selective”, Il Giornale dell’Arte, n. 156, June 1997, p. 12.
  • “A new bill for the 2%”, Il Giornale dell’Arte, n. 156, June 1997, p. 12.
  • “Attempt: the first and only cataloging to date of new art at 2%”, Il Giornale dell’Arte, n. 156, June, 1997, pp. 12-14.
  • Daniela Fonti, “The absence of a common feeling. Some considerations on the current state of the 2% law”, Arte e Critica, n. 20, October-December 1999, pp. 20-21.
  • Marco Perli, “Monuments at 2%”, Art and Criticism, n. 20, October-December 1999, p. 26.
  • Ugo Giuliani, “Two percent law: reform hypotheses ”, Exibart.com, January 11, 2002
  • “2 percent law, in Venice two days of debate”, Exibart.com, 4 February 2004
  • Davide Lacagnina, “Palermo does justice”, Exibart.com, May 25, 2004
  • Adriana Martino, “Three works of art in the new Palace of Justice in Pescara”, Segno, n. 197, July-August 2004, pp. 64-69.
  • Ferdinando Ferrigno, “The 2% law from Bottai to Veltroni”, Terzocchio, n. 1, January-March 2007, pp. 6-9
  • Carlo Fabrizio Carli, “A provision born in ’42 and revised after the war. Many words and few facts”, Terzocchio, n. 1, January-March 2007, p. 10.
  • Andrea Romoli, “Barilli and Calvesi: a good law but attention to conflicts of interest and incompetents”, Terzocchio, n. 1, January-March 2007, p. 11.
  • Enrico Crispolti, “Involving artists in the redesign of the urban image”, Terzocchio, n. 2, April-June 2007.
  • Massimiliano Scuderi, “New Court, Pescara. Ettore Spalletti, Enzo Cucchi, Michelangelo Pistoletto”, MU6. The Journal of the Museums of Abruzzo, n. 11, 2009, pp. 7-9
  • “Art law and public works. We talk about it at the IRIS project, at the Fabbrica del Vapore in Milan: three questions to Alessandra Donati”, Exibart.com, 12 December 2013.
  • Claudia Balocchini, “Art in the public spaces. History of the 2% law”, Artribune, 20 July 2016
  • On the W@terfront, Architecture and art published in Italy after 1945. I. Social Mappings, vol. 54, May 2017
  • On the W@terfront, Architecture and art published in Italy after 1945. II. From the 2% law to new declinations…, vol. 55, June 2017

Graduate thesis

  • Arianna Ferraretto, The 2% of art. History of the law for art in public buildings and analysis of three case studies in Italy, degree thesis (supervisor: Prof. Agnes Kohlmeyer, co-supervisor: Arch. Franco Gazzarri), IUAV University of Venice, Faculty of Design and Arts , aa. 2014/2015

Cover and internal page of Primato, 1942.

Cover and internal page of NAC, 1972 .

2% cover: considerations in the margin, 1990.

Cover of Contemporary Creation. Art, society and territory between public and private, 2004.

Cover of Public art in urban space Clients, artists and users, 2007.

Double internal page of Terzocchio, 2007.

Cover of Standards for art in buildings public (L. 717/1949). Comparing experiences, 2008.

Cover of Il cento per l'arte in Emilia-Romagna. The law of 29 July 1949 n. 717: applications and evolutions of the 2% on the territory, 2009.

Pagina aggiornata il 21/12/2023